Bigtobaccotakedown’s Blog

A gathering against the tobacco industry

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

National Post apologizes to national tobacco control thinktank

without comments

National Post, Nov. 13, 2009, p.2
RETRACTION AND APOLOGY

An editorial entitled ‘”Turning smoking into a crime” in the October 27, 2009 edition of the National Post stated that the Non-Smokers’ Rights Association advocates the amendment of Ontario’s building code to prohibit smoking in all apartments and condominiums. That is not correct. The NSRA in fact supports a variety of measures to eliminate the serious health hazards for non-smokers that result from the pollution of their air supply by second-hand tobacco smoke entering their homes from other units. The NSRA pursues this goal by working with health units, landlord and tenant associations and municipalities. A ban on “smoking in all apartments and condominiums” would require provincial legislation. The NSRA has never advocated the use of building codes or any other measures to achieve this end.
In addition, a ‘Correction’ published in the November 3, 2009 edition of the National Post stated that the NSRA advocates the elimination of smoking in multiple-unit buildings such as apartment and condominium complexes. In fact, the NSRA supports the provision of non-smoking and smoking permitted apartment and condominium complexes provided that provision of the latter does not compromise the health of non-smokers in other units.
The National Post regrets the errors and apologizes to the Non-Smokers’ Rights Association.
————————————————————–
Statement from Gar Mahood, Non-Smokers’ Rights Association, November 13, 2009

In late October, the National Post published an editorial on the issue of second-hand tobacco smoke in multi-unit dwellings that attacked the Non-Smokers’ Rights Association for its position on this issue.  The Association reacted quickly.  It alleged that the editorial was based on false statements and that it was defamatory.

In response to the alleged defamation, the NSRA served notice that it intended to sue for libel and demanded a retraction and apology.  That retraction and apology was published today in the National Post (see attachment).

“The NSRA will defend itself vigorously from unjust attacks,” said NSRA executive director Garfield Mahood.  “And we will pursue all tobacco control issues aggressively, in keeping with the seriousness of harm that the tobacco industry inflicts on Canadians.”

The harm done to the NSRA by the editorial can never be fully repaired.  But this is a start.  Many serious people read the offensive remarks in that editorial, from journalists at the Post’s major competitor, The Globe and Mail to members of every editorial board in the nation, press galleries, health bureaucrats, ministerial political staffers and donors. But being challenged by one of Canada’s top defamation lawyers acting for the NSRA sends a message to the National Post, to other papers, and to opinion leaders nation-wide that health groups may not react passively to bullies.  The bully may not like us, as the saying goes, but, by golly, the bully will respect us.

The news release that focused attention on the defamation follows.  The retraction and apology is attached.

Garfield Mahood, OC
Executive Director
Non-Smokers’ Rights Association
720 Spadina Avenue, Suite 221
Toronto, Ontario
M5S 2T9
Tel: (416) 928-2900
Res: (416) 964-6279
Cel: (416) 451-4285
Fax: (416) 928-1860
Email: gmahood@nsra-adnf.ca

——————————————————————————\
http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/November2009/10/c7390.html
Canada Newswire
Attention News Editors:
Health group serves National Post with notice of libel suit
TORONTO, Nov. 10 /CNW/ – The Non-Smokers’ Rights Association (NSRA) has served the National Post with a notice of the Association’s intention to sue the paper under the Ontario Libel and Slander Act. The October 27th editorial alleged that the NSRA is “pressuring” the Ontario government to use building code reforms “to forbid smoking in all apartments and condominiums.” The allegation is false and has harmed the NSRA. Although the National Post published a “correction” on November 3rd, the so-called “Correction” was itself incorrect and merely aggravated the harm done to the NSRA in the editorial.
“The NSRA, like virtually all health organizations,” said Garfield Mahood, NSRA executive director, “is sensitive to concerns about regulating smoking in the privacy of the homes of smokers. This is just one of the reasons that Non-Smokers’ Rights Association has always opposed a blanket prohibition on either tobacco or smoking, especially in private homes. However, in keeping with long-accepted common law and public health principles, when behaviour in private multi-unit dwellings creates a health hazard for others who are sharing the same air supply, the NSRA will continue to work with health units, municipalities, landlords and tenants to prevent second-hand smoke from harming innocent parties who share common air.”
The NSRA takes the position that residents of multi-unit dwellings, when they share the same air through close proximity, ventilation systems, halls, stairways and leakage through cracks and gaps, must recognize that second-hand smoke presents a real risk to their neighbours and that they have a responsibility to their fellow residents. “Advocating for the elimination of this risk in multi-unit dwellings,” said Mr. Mahood, “is in no way advocating for the prohibition alleged by the National Post.”
“A ban on ’smoking in all apartments and condominiums,’” said Peter Downard, a lawyer with Fasken Martineau who specializes in the law of defamation, “would require provincial legislation. The NSRA has never advocated the use of building codes or any other measure to achieve this end. Nor has the NSRA advocated for criminalization of smoking behaviour as suggested by the headline (of the editorial) ‘Turning smoking into a crime.’”
The lengthy editorial with its belittling and offensive language based on a false premise is “defamatory” and has harmed “a national organization which has won many national and international awards,” said Downard. The NSRA was referred to by the Post as an “Ontario” organization.
In his notice under the Libel and Slander Act, Downard demanded a retraction and apology for the editorial.
The NSRA was the recipient of the inaugural Luther L. Terry Award created by the American Cancer Society to honour U.S. Surgeon General Luther Terry whose historic 1964 report established tobacco products as a cause of lung cancer. An international panel of judges cited the NSRA in the “Outstanding Organization” category for tobacco control organizations worldwide.
For further information: Garfield Mahood, OC, Executive Director, Tel: (416) 928-2900, Cell: (416) 451-4285

Written by bigtobaccotakedown

November 13, 2009 at 4:01 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Big Tobacco wants to weaken bill c-32

without comments

Action Alert from Canadian Cancer Society:

The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology is meeting tomorrow, Wed. Sept. 30, at 4:00pm.  This is the final scheduled meeting where witnesses are to be heard.  It is possible that immediately following the witnesses tomorrow, the Committee will give clause by clause consideration to the bill.  It is at this point that any amendments will be considered.  The Committee could approve the bill without amendments, which is what health organizations are recommending.

The tobacco industry has increased its lobbying campaign, and we need to respond.

Please take a moment to email all Senators on the Committee to ask them to oppose any amendments to weaken the bill, including the name of your organization in your email.  Please ask your networks to do the same.  Here is an email list of Senators on the Committee that you could cut and paste into your email:

callbc@sen.parl.gc.ca; cookj@sen.parl.gc.ca; cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca; dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca; egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca; fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca; keonw@sen.parl.gc.ca; pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca; martiny@sen.parl.gc.ca; eatonn@sen.parl.gc.ca; kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca; ogilvk@sen.parl.gc.ca;

Here is a sample email (but it is best if you say things in your own words, or add a short personal/organizational perspective):

Dear Honourable Senators:

I am writing to urge you to support Bill C-32 without any amendments.  Please oppose the amendment supported by the tobacco industry that would allow flavours in cigarettes.  This would weaken the bill.

Yours truly,

Written by bigtobaccotakedown

September 29, 2009 at 2:59 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Employment Opportunity

without comments

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

Research Coordinator (2 Positions)

Initial Assignment:  Canadian Action Network for the Advancement, Dissemination, and Adoption of Practice-informed Tobacco Treatment (CAN-ADAPTT) Practice-Based Research Network, Addictions Program

Position Description:

The Nicotine Dependence Clinic CAN-ADAPTT project at the Centre for Addiction and MentalHealth is seeking two highly energetic and motivated individuals with project coordination experience and computer skills to work on a knowledge translation and better practices project as Research Coordinators.  The candidates must be able to work independently and effectively in a multidisciplinary team environment.  He/she will maintain contact with non-CAMH partners and program participants and other key stakeholders.  This position is currently located at 175 College Street but may involve some travel.  Reporting to the CAN-ADAPTT Manager, you will provide coordination for a segment of the Canadian Action Network.  You will work closely with the Manager and Network Coordinator to:

  • Proactively engage health care providers, researchers, and policy makers to participate in the network
  • Stimulate and solicit ideas for new studies from practitioners and researchers
  • Facilitate liaisons between practitioner/providers and researchers
  • Organize regional meetings, workplans, and assessments at participating practices
  • Liaise with community organizations and other tobacco control projects
  • Administer the regional network
  • Coordinate research projects
  • Develop conference abstracts and submissions

Qualifications:

The successful candidate will possess a Master’s degree in a related field.  This position requires superior negotiation skills, the ability to build and maintain relationships in order to negotiate within a large project with multiple stakeholders.  Leadership and team player skills are essential as well as a proactive attitude and a willingness to be committed and strive for continuous improvement.  The successful candidate should have the ability to explain complex issues in plain language both verbally and in writing, be skilled in web-based collaboration, and have demonstrated proficiency with a variety of software packages including project management, word-processing and presentation software.  You will have excellent interpersonal, communication (verbal/written), organizational skills and a solid understanding of research methodology.  You have demonstrated experience required to assist in the development of research proposals, review literature, and write reports.  You have an understanding of provincial health networks, health care professionals and researchers.  Candidates require the ability to work effectively with individuals from diverse backgrounds.Knowledge of tobacco control programs, policy, and research would be definite assets.  Bilingualism (French/English) and/or proficiency in a second language would be an asset.

Please Note: These two full-time, 7-month contract positions (until March 31, 2010) are part of the

OPSEU Bargaining Unit.

Salary Range: $28.24 – $38.09 per hour

Please forward your résumé to:

Human Resources

Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

1001 Queen Street West

Toronto, Ontario                                                        Fax:  (416) 583-4316

M6J 1H4                                                                      E-mail:  jobs@camh.net

Please remember to include the File Number when applying.

File Number:                    09423

As an employment equity employer CAMH actively seeks Aboriginal peoples, visible minorities,

women, people with disabilities, (including people with who have experienced mental health

and substance use challenges), and additional diverse identities for our workforce.

Written by bigtobaccotakedown

September 15, 2009 at 3:42 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Update on bill c-32

without comments

From Rob Cunningham at the Canadian Cancer Society:

Yesterday, the Senate rose for the summer. The Senate will return on Tuesday Sept. 15.

Regrettably, Bill C-32 did not pass prior to the recess.

Bill C-32 did receive First Reading in the Senate on June 17. On Monday June 22, Second Reading debate did begin, with a speech by Conservative Senator Dr. Wilbert Keon, the heart surgeon. To read the speech, visit Hansard:

English: http://www.parl.gc.ca/40/2/parlbus/chambus/senate/deb-e/049db_2009-06-22-E.htm?Language=E&Parl=40&Ses=2#50
French: http://www.parl.gc.ca/40/2/parlbus/chambus/senate/deb-f/049db_2009-06-22-f.htm?Language=F&Parl=40&Ses=2#50

Bill C-32 was not further debated yesterday.

To be adopted by the Senate, Bill C-32 will need to receive Second Reading, Committee consideration and approval, and Third Reading.

Delays in adopting the bill will result in delay implementing the bill’s provisions. The ban on advertising in newspapers and magazines comes into force on the day of Royal Assent. That means that Canada will face another summer of tobacco advertising in publications. The ban on flavoured cigarillos, blunt wraps and cigarettes (menthol excepted) comes into force 6 months after Royal Assent at the manufacturer level, and 9 months after Royal Assent at the retail level. Thus these flavoured products will remain available to kids for at least three months longer than if the bill had been adopted by now.

Thank you to the many, many people who contacted Senators urging adoption of Bill C-32. While unfortunately the bill did not pass prior to the summer recess, this broad communication of support from across Canada has been very important and helpful. All of this will help in the autumn as we seek Senate passage. The Senate has heard from many voices about the importance of this bill passing. Thank you.

Note that opponents of the bill have also been communicating to Senators. A further reason why our voice has been — and will be –important.

The importance of this bill is underlined by the fact that the bill has passed the industry “scream” test. The industry, especially Philip Morris (the RBH parent company), is very concerned by this bill. Cigarettes in Canada are basically unflavoured except for menthol, and except for perhaps less than 1% of the market that are U.S. imports, for a few other brands such as Gauloises or Gitanes (which are apparently made in the RBH factory in Quebec City.) In an effort to block the bill, the industry has come up with bogus claims of trade violations, bogus claims of job losses at the Quebec City RBH factory, among other misinformation.

With advertising increasingly being restricted the industry will place increasing importance on flavourings to attract and retain consumers – that is if the industry is allowed to get away with it. Fortunately, Bill C-32 will clamp down on this potential avenue. Internationally, flavourings in cigarettes are more important than is currently the case in Canada.

On Friday, about 100 employees of the Quebec City factory of Rothmans, Benson & Hedges were bused in for the protest outside the Prime Minister’s Office (Langevin Building on Wellington Street). The group also went across the street to Parliament Hill. There was very little media interest in this.

Written by bigtobaccotakedown

June 24, 2009 at 12:28 pm

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with

Questioning addiction

without comments

While new articles as of late challenge nicotine addiction and all addiction it is important to remember, as well stated by Dr. Peter Selby:

“There was a time when people believed the world was flat too.

Many diseased states are amenable to volition and choice. Just because someone can control their cholesterol, type II diabetes or hypertension with behavioural interventions doesn’t mean these aren’t legitimate chronic diseases.”

Additionally, as Dr. Greaves says, “this sometimes said about those who smoke – that it is their choice. But in this case it isn’t an adult choice since almost all smokers become addicted as children. In fact today’s smokers are the children who became addicted when the tobacco industry promoted to them and health organizations did little to protect them.”

Addiction is voluntary, author contends in new book
Updated Wed. Jun. 17 2009 10:08 AM ET

CTV.ca News Staff

The idea that addiction is a disease and that addicts do not have control over their disease, has been a pillar of belief of the psychology community for decades. Yet Gene Heyman, a lecturer in psychology at Harvard Medical School, has set off a firestorm by questioning this time-honoured assumption in his new book, Addiction: A Disorder of Choice.
Heyman argues that addiction is very much governed by personal choice and is not an involuntary illness. He says the long-held belief that addicts cannot control their addiction may be well-meaning but is ultimately wrong.
The proof, Heyman says, lies in the number of people who are able to beat their addiction and the reasons they do.
“When people say that addiction is a disease they mean that drug users have become involuntary, that they simply can’t say no,” Heyman told Canada AM Wednesday.
“I asked the question: What factors influence drug use to halt in addicts? Things like values and laws, being worried about being arrested, financial matters and respect from family — these are the things that influence decisions.
“And so I looked to see if those factors influenced drug use in addicts. And it turns out when you look at the literature broadly, that’s exactly what happens. So I take a different conceptual framework.”
The problem with the field of addiction is that people have restricted their analysis, says Heyman. They contend when you consider the terrible toll that addiction takes on the lives of addicts, “no one would choose to be an addict.”
Heyman agrees that yes, addicts are self-destructive, but this does not mean they will not change their behaviour once the costs of continuing their addiction become too great.
“I began looking at biographies, at the epidemiological literature, at studies where anthropologists lived with addicts, and what we see again and again is the pattern of behaviour where the factors such as the desire for the respect of children or parents or worries about finances lead addicts to stop using drugs. So that’s the real test,” he explains.
He says when addiction experts tell addicts their addiction disease is “involuntary,” it doesn’t help them. If anything, it may give them a crutch to enable them to continue. “What the data show is that most addicts actually quit. And this is encouraging. To be told that you have a chronic relapsing disease that has no cure cannot be helpful — but especially if it’s not the truth,” says Heyman.
“But the truth, when we look at the data, is that most addicts quit, and they can be encouraged to quit much sooner. I think what is required to help someone quit is the knowledge that it is possible and that there’s a better life once you do quit.
“Smoking is an addiction. And since the 1964 publishing of the U.S. Surgeon General’s report, about 80 per cent of smokers have quit, and they typically quit on their own. So we know that people can quit an addiction.”

Written by bigtobaccotakedown

June 18, 2009 at 12:28 pm

Posted in Uncategorized